Skip to content
Innovation · Product Strategy · Manufacturing Consulting · Melbourne, est. 2013 1300 765 926info@polyconint.comBook an obligation-free discussion

Case study: designing an electronics enclosure for recyclability

9 May 2023 · 2 min read · Plastic Part Design · Case study

A European customer required a consumer electronics brand to show how its products could be recycled. Cutting material types from seven to three, replacing screws with snap fits and moulding in labels raised recyclable mass from 61% to 94% and cut disassembly time from 140 to 55 seconds.

Key numbers

Material types
73
▲ Improved −57%
Disassembly time
140s55s
▲ Improved −61%
Recyclable mass
61%94%
▲ Improved +54%

A consumer electronics brand received a new requirement from a major European customer: show how your products can be recycled at end of life. When the engineering team took apart one of its enclosures to answer the question, the answer was uncomfortable. Separating the materials took more than two minutes per unit, and much of the enclosure could not realistically be recycled at all.

What the data showed

The enclosure combined seven materials: a PC/ABS housing, a TPE seal, steel screws, glued labels, adhesives and several other small components. The glued labels and adhesives contaminated the plastic, the steel screws had to be removed individually, and the mixture of materials made separation impractical. Only 61% of the enclosure's mass was recyclable in practice.

What changed

The redesign applied the principles described in recycled plastics in engineering parts, from the other end of the life cycle:

  • The housing was switched to a single PP grade, with a TPE seal chosen to be compatible with PP for recycling.
  • Screws were replaced with snap fits, designed to strain limits for the material, as in snap-fit design, and made releasable for disassembly.
  • Labels were moulded in rather than glued, removing adhesives and dissimilar label materials.
  • Material identification codes were moulded into the parts.

Results

Material types fell from seven to three. Recyclable mass rose from 61% to 94%. Disassembly time fell from 140 to 55 seconds, making end-of-life separation practical. The redesign also removed the cost of screws, adhesives and label application from assembly.

Why it worked

Recyclability was treated as a design requirement, not an afterthought. Each decision, a single compatible polymer family, mechanical rather than adhesive joining and moulded-in marking, removed a barrier to recycling. Several of the same decisions also reduced assembly cost.

Lessons for your operation

  • Recyclability is decided at the design stage.
  • Fewer, compatible materials make recycling practical.
  • Snap fits and screws are better than adhesives where separation is needed.
  • Mould in labels and material codes rather than adding them.
  • Customer sustainability requirements are often an opportunity to simplify products too.
Polycon Engineering TeamEngineering and manufacturing consultants since 2013
Start a conversation

Let’s turn your next idea into a market-ready product.

Whether it’s a bold new product, a strategy that needs sharpening or an operation that should be doing more, a conversation with a senior consultant is the fastest way to find out what’s possible.

  • Free initial consultation with a senior engineer
  • Response within one business day
  • Confidentiality and NDA available on request
ServingAustralia · New Zealand · United Kingdom · United States · Asia

Prefer to give us the full picture? Use the detailed project enquiry form

Tell us about your project

Fields marked * are required. Your details are handled under our Privacy Policy.